Suzanne presents to the birth center for her first prenatal visit. She has transferred care from a local obstetrician’s office at 23 weeks. Her previous pregnancy ended in cesarean section after being stalled at six centimeters for several hours. Suzanne has spent 3 years researching Vaginal Birth After cesarean Section (VBAC). She answers questions guardedly in short sentences, never elaborating. During the physical she will not allow a pelvic exam. She will not discuss the reason why, just firmly states that it simply isn’t necessary and she prefers not to do it. She vows that her birth experience will not be repeated.
Melissa’s first birth over 10 years ago was in a hospital. Her water had broken and she never got into labor. Her birth center midwives had to transfer her to the hospital. The midwives did not have privileges and could not continue her care. After many hours of painfully induced labor, she received an epidural – something she had strongly hoped to avoid. The nurse refused to examine her until after she was comfortable with her epidural at which time she was found to be complete. After pushing for a short time, the doctor vacuumed her 5 lb baby over a mediolateral episiotomy. Melissa did not even realize that an episiotomy had been done and the doctor never told her why a vacuum was needed. Melissa desperately desires a birth center birth and continually experiences anxiety about going to the hospital and having a repeat experience. She has even considered having her baby at home alone if her next labor follows a similar course.
These two stories, at first read, do not seem to represent childbirth that a typical obstetric provider would deem “traumatic”. Yet if one were to speak with each woman about her first birth, she would reveal memories marked by horrific pain, feelings of powerlessness, mistreatment by unsympathetic caregivers, and fear for her life or her child’s life.
Traumatic childbirth may physically define or alter future pregnancies – this much is obvious to even the casual observer. More importantly, yet vastly ignored, is the impact such an experience can have upon a woman’s psyche, her soul, during the subsequent antepartum period. The purpose of this paper is to define traumatic childbirth both physiologically and emotionally, and help the midwife identify such clientele during the antepartum. Methods of treatment will also be explored. Much research remains to be done in this area of women’s reproductive health.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Using key words of traumatic birth, traumatic childbirth, postpartum depression, post traumatic stress disorder, and reconciling childbirth, precious few articles were found. The overwhelming majority of the literature focuses on the immediate postpartum period and how to debrief and / or counsel woman who have had a traumatic experience. Most of the studies show that some women can develop post-traumatic stress disorder after a traumatic birth experience. There are virtually no studies that have been conducted on helping women in their next pregnancy to overcome or cope with a previously traumatic birth. There is literature on helping survivors of sexual abuse and/or rape during the antepartum and intrapartum period. Perhaps these techniques can be of some use to the antepartum woman to prepare for her next birth experience, but this has not been studied.
DEFINING TRAUMATIC BIRTH
So exactly what defines a traumatic birth? One author explains it as childbirth which involves actual or threatened serious injury or death to the mother or baby (Beck, 2004). The mother responds to these events with intense fear, helplessness, loss of control, or horror. Beck continues that what a mother perceives as birth trauma may be viewed as routine in the eyes of the obstetric provider, and therefore the staff may provide no interventions to relieve the mother’s stress in the postpartum period.
Parker (2004) defines traumatic birth strictly in terms of the medical interventions used – namely emergent cesarean section, forceps or vacuum assisted deliveries, fetal death or injury, or maternal injury or illness. Parker does, however, concede that a woman’s perception of the trauma may be of more import than the actual interventions. Factors associated with traumatic birth perceptions include long labors, severe pain, obstetrical interventions, powerlessness, lack of communication and support by caregivers, and differences between expectations of labor and the actual event (Beck, 2004).
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was defined and added to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) in 1980. Childbirth was added to the DSM-IV in 1994 as a recognized cause of PTSD (McKenzie-McHarg, 2004). One author asserts that since PTSD can occur after birth, this variant should be called “traumatic birth experience” (Reynolds, 1997).
Reynolds continues that PTSD was first described among men returning from the Vietnam War and is characterized by several features. The first is that the person has experienced a traumatic event during which she felt threatened by death or serious injury and responded with fear, helplessness, or horror. All other components of PTSD involve the ongoing reactions of the woman to the event (Beck, 2004). She will persistently re-live the event, avoid stimuli associated with the event, be emotionally numbed to the event, and display symptoms of increased physical arousal (Creedy, Shochet, and Horsfall, 2000). Symptoms persist for more than one month and affect her ability to function (Reynolds, 1997).
DSM-IV specifies that chronic PTSD cannot possibly be diagnosed less than 3 months after the traumatic event (McKenzie-McHarg, 2004). McKenzie-McHarg explains that during and after the event, - dual memories occur and it takes time for a woman to process and reconcile those 2 memories. Those who cannot, develop PTSD. According to Beck (2004), immediate single-episode postpartum counseling can be detrimental; it interrupts this reconciliation process that a woman must go through.
The incidence of PTSD in American women is 13 per 1000 vs. 5 per 1000 for men (Reynolds, 1997), though it has not been determined how much of this is due to childbirth. Reynolds analyzed other studies and concludes that the incidence due to childbirth is likely to be 0.2%. McKenzie-McHarg’s article cites that 8.1% of women in the antenatal period fulfill requirements of PTSD while only 2.8% and 1.5% at 6 weeks and 6 months respectively do. Perhaps this can be interpreted to mean that the postpartum incidence is strictly due to a traumatic birth, while antenatal it could be from a previous birth or other trauma. Beck found that 3% of women in the postpartum period exhibited intrusions, avoidance, and hyper arousal of PTSD.
Visiting postpartum depression, it is recognized that a traumatic experience is one predictor of postpartum depression. The incidence ranges from 10-24% and usually resolves spontaneously by six months (Parker, 2004). Though birth experience alone is not the sole cause of all cases of PPD, it is a component that may affect women in the next antenatal period.
Whether or not a woman is diagnosed with PTSD, it is quite probable that a woman can continue to experience physical and emotional symptoms well into the next antenatal period. The midwife needs to have some way to identify these women and help them during the antepartum. Though there are no studies available on treatments specifically for the pregnant woman who has experienced traumatic birth causing depression or PTSD, the methods described in this paper are typical of midwifery care. A woman who believes her previous birth was traumatic, whether from a physical or emotional standpoint, may in fact seek the midwifery model of care in an attempt to prevent a repeat of her previous experience.
IDENTIFYING WOMEN WITH TRAUMATIC BIRTHS
How is a midwife to know that a woman has had a previous traumatic birth experience? In Gamble and Creedy (2004), only one model (by Kendall-Tackett and Kaufman-Kantor) has attempted to explain emotional distress after birth. This model is based upon a model of childhood sexual abuse survivors. The model does not assume trauma is caused by one event, and further that interpersonal factors are central to the trauma rather than the trauma itself. This would seem to support authors Beck and Reynolds who assert that it is the woman’s perception of the trauma rather than the actual physical experience that is the core of the psychological reactions.
Begin the initial prenatal visit with a careful history of the client’s previous pregnancies including births, abortions, miscarriages, and stillbirths (Reynolds, 1997). Previous pregnancy losses may also be viewed as traumatic, and these “failures” may make her certain she will fail at birth as well. Let her tell her story and listen between the lines.
Is her memory of the birth punctuated with anger, fear, sadness, or powerlessness? Or perhaps she can remember nothing of the birth - suggestive of traumatic amnesia (Reynolds, 1997). She may describe the birth in terms of watching it happen to someone else, as if she were not there at all. This is a form of depersonalization, common in victims of trauma (Reynolds, 1997).
A physically traumatic birth may result in feelings of helplessness, horror, pain, and fear. Yet a woman who describes a typical medically normal birth can still be left feeling psychologically traumatized. Early in the postpartum period, women rationalize obstetric intervention and may not immediately express dissatisfaction with their care (Creedy, Shochet, and Horsfall, 2000). It is after time elapses and memories assimilate that dissatisfaction may emerge.
The severe emotional effects of traumatic birth can lead to trouble in the postpartum period. Inquire about breastfeeding, bonding, sexuality, and timing of the current pregnancy (Reynolds, 1997). Feelings of low self-worth or failure are commonly expressed. Postpartum depression can be a factor that extends into the current pregnancy.
Avoidance behavior is common with previous traumatic birth. She may have delayed or attempted to avoid another pregnancy altogether. Some have chosen termination vs. re-traumatization during another birth. Demanding cesarean section is avoidance behavior (Reynolds, 1997).
If she is describing what seems to be a traumatic experience, then be sure to ask if she felt that her life or the baby’s life were threatened. Refusing pelvic exams, screaming uncontrollably, or severely withdrawing are symptoms displayed by women undergoing traumatic birth (Reynolds, 1997).
The midwife should ask about flashbacks, nightmares, intrusive thoughts, or insomnia. Re-living the trauma is a manifestation of PTSD. A woman who cannot seem to trust her caregivers, asks multiple questions, or has an elaborate birth plan has a strong need to control her next experience and may suffer from extreme anxiety (Reynolds, 1997). Seeking extreme control may be the woman’s attempt to have a “redemptive” birth (Reynolds, 1997).
Find out if there was a postpartum depression and ascertain if this is ongoing in the current pregnancy. The caregiver must act if depression is suspected. Depression in the postpartum period begins after the first few weeks and can seriously affect women and their families well into the next antenatal period.
One of the characteristics of midwifery care is attending to the emotional component of her pregnancy. Midwives tend to view the whole woman – she is more than her uterus. Simply showing an interest in how she is feeling about her next labor and birth may be enough for her to begin the emotional healing necessary to reconcile her previous birth experience.
The key is listening to what the woman desires for her next birth experience. Good education is key here to helping the woman adequately prepare. For example, a woman who comes in demanding a cesarean in order to avoid labor needs to understand that cesarean birth is not pain or risk free. In fact, in Creedy, Shochet, and Horsfall’s 2000 study, 2 of 38 women who had chosen elective cesarean birth developed PTSD. A woman who has been educated during the antepartum period as to the risks, benefits, and alternatives to elective cesarean and who has done appropriate emotion work regarding her fear may choose not to have cesarean birth after all.
In Reynolds’ article as well as Parker’s, it is suggested that is imperative that a woman with a previously traumatic birth be offered excellent pain control and good communication (Parker, 2004; Reynolds, 1997). However, according to Creedy, Shochet, and Horsfall, 21 of 28 women who had PTSD had epidural anesthesia, considered the ultimate in labor pain-relief. Women must be educated that labor can never be guaranteed to be pain-free. Some pain even with epidural anesthesia is to be expected. Preparing for pain and learning techniques to cope with pain is a goal of antepartum education. While pain free labor should never be promised, good communication between caregiver and client should be an expectation. Interestingly, some women will seek a caregiver who does not promote epidurals. Perhaps part of these women’s trauma is the numbing effect of the epidural not only on the pain but also on the ability of the woman to have any control of her position or the cascade of interventions that typically coincide with epidural use.
Part of antenatal education should involve building trust between woman and midwife. Women’s experience of limited choice and control in decision-making is associated with dissatisfaction, feelings of lack of respect, and reports of more painful response to procedures (Creedy, Shochet, and Horsfall, 2000). Building a trusting relationship with a woman helps to empower that woman. An empowered and knowledgeable woman entering the labor ward, with the support of her midwife, makes more informed decisions about obstetric interventions or refusal of such. She may feel that she “owns” that decision rather than having things simply done to her during the vulnerable period of labor and delivery. Frank discussions of obstetric interventions may lessen a woman’s fear of these should the need arise during labor (Creedy, Shochet, and Horsfall, 2000).
A woman with obsessive anxiety or worry about her upcoming birth needs the support of her midwife. England and Horowitz (1998) state that worry is the work of pregnancy. All mothers-to-be have some anxiety regarding the birth. Assurance that this is normal is useful to decrease concern. The three most common worries of laboring women are: fear of pain, fear of dying, and fear of having an abnormal or dead baby (England and Horowitz, 1998).
What is more helpful is to worry effectively. A woman with anxiety should be encouraged to write down her fears, especially the ones that create a physical sensation of tension in her body (England and Horowitz, 1998). According to Birthing from Within (1998), the midwife can then go over each fear with the woman and discuss them in light of each of the following:
What would you do if this worry/fear actually happened?
What do you imagine your partner (or birth attendant) would do / say?
What would it mean about you (as a mother) if this happened?
How have you faced crises in the past?
What, if anything, can you do to prepare for, or even prevent, what you are worrying about? What’s keeping you from doing it?
If there’s nothing you can do to prevent it, how would you like to handle the situation?
For a woman with continuing fear of being “out of control” in labor, this is perhaps another interesting tool to use in the antepartum - nutritional counseling. Learning to listen to the body’s appetite helps a woman to learn patterns of behavior that can be beneficial in labor. England and Horowitz (1998) prescribe that women need to eat in awareness. In other words, practice eating appropriate foods every day and being in the moment instead of eating distractedly. This helps a woman develop patterns of being present and strong which can carry over to her pattern of behavior in labor. Nutrition is something she can do every single day to affect the outcome of her baby’s health. It is not just a mindless task. Nutrition is another way to empower a woman. Or through attention to nutrition and eating, she can learn to be present in the moment, which can be a useful strategy for coping with labor.
Exploring birth art or journaling may be a way for a woman to delve into her feelings, worries, or needs during her pregnancy and birth. As England and Horowitz state, learning what is necessary for a woman to participate completely in birth comes from within herself. Making birth art or journaling can be surprisingly revealing. It may help to unleash emotions that can inhibit a woman from letting go during labor. Having a copy of the book in a lending library for antepartum clients is yet another tool in a midwife’s bag of tricks to offer women with high anxiety about a previous birth experience.
A woman with hyper arousal symptoms of PTSD may present a very detailed birth plan to her midwife. Vigilantly planning for a better birth experience seems like a good idea – to spell out precisely what a woman wants, needs, and desires. The need for such detail stems usually from mistrust or anxiety about one’s caregivers, fear or the unknown, and/or lack of confidence in their ability to express and assert their needs in that vulnerable period of labor.
Birth cannot always be planned and it is essential that a midwife encourage women to develop an understanding of the unpredictable nature of her birth course, as well as a trust in their own bodies to give birth. A written birth plan cannot substitute for a trusted relationship between midwife and woman. If a midwife accepts a birth plan, there is a tendency for the woman to stop effectively worrying, exploring, or accessing personal resources (England and Horowitz, 1998). Writing a birth plan may initially make a woman feel powerful. The downside is that it is hard to “let go” when her guard is up in labor.
A wise midwife, Sandra Williamson, once told me that ‘what a woman resists, persists’ (personal communication, August, 2004). Avoiding a discussion of fears may cause them to persist; monsters live in the dark.
There’s a difference between normal, fleeting worries of pregnancy and what England and Horowitz call “tigers.” A tiger, real or imagined, is something that creates a physical sensation in your gut, triggers nightmares, or constant worry. Taming tigers is a task for the antepartum woman with a previous traumatic birth. A woman with tigers will not feel safe in birth because she is experiencing flight or fight. To track and tame tigers England and Horowitz (1998, p. 118) suggest that a woman:
Write down all the things she hopes will not happen
Look the tigers in the eye (let imagination flow into the fear)
Ask herself – what do I need to do to tame or escape each tiger (i.e., what will make this birth place safe?)
DO IT! (Even if she is afraid). Get help if needed.
A woman with a previously traumatic birth may need more help than a midwife has to offer. If she is truly seems to suffering from PTSD or from depression, psychotherapy may become necessary. Referral to a specialist in PTSD or postpartum depression may become essential at some point during this pregnancy.
Other women may benefit from such alternative therapies as acupuncture. Healing emotionally through acupuncture is a prime benefit of Chinese medicine (Melissa Veaudry-Martin, personal communication, October, 2004). It is thought that energy flows through the body along meridians. When energy flow is interrupted this can cause any number of physical and psychological ailments. PTSD, depression, and anxiety can be treated with the help of an acupuncturist.
Be aware, and wary, of the childbirth education classes a woman is attending. All childbirth preparation classes are not created equally. A woman with excessive anxiety may well benefit from courses taught by instructors who value normalcy and support alternatives. Courses which focus on helping a woman let go during labor and empower her to make informed decisions would clearly be helpful. Classes focusing on relaxation techniques, role-playing, partner-support, and communication skills may empower a woman and set her upon a healing path.
CONCLUSION
The incidence of PTSD and depression attributable to a traumatic birth experience is truly unknown. A fascinating finding from Creedy, Shochet, and Horsfall’s study is that 1 in 3 women reported a stressful birth event with three or more trauma symptoms (extreme pain, fear for her or the baby’s life, and a perceived lack of care). Though at the conclusion of this study only 5.6% of women actually fit the criteria for PTSD, it is astounding that so many women would consider themselves traumatized. Trauma is truly in the eyes of the beholder (Beck, 2004).
Being able to reconcile that experience is something that takes time, weeks to even years. A woman must process the experience and can learn and grow from it. Perhaps some of the methods described in this paper will be helpful to those women who have been unable to reconcile their experience thus far. Much remains to be studied in this area.
REFERENCES
Beck, C.T. (2004). Birth trauma: in the eye of the beholder. Nursing Research, 53 (1), 28- 35.
Creedy, D.K., Shochet, I. M., & Horsfall, J. (2000). Childbirth and the development of acute trauma symptoms: incidence and contributing factors. Birth 27 (2), 104 -111.
England , P. & Horowitz, R. (1998). Birthing from within: an extra-ordinary guide to childbirth preparation. Albuquerque , NM : Partera Press.
Gamble, J., & Creedy, D. (2004). Content and processes of postpartum counseling after a distressing birth experience: a review. Birth, 31 (3), 213-217).
McKenzie-McHarg, K. (2004). Traumatic birth: understanding predictors, triggers, and counseling process is essential to treatment. Birth, 31 (3), 219 – 220).
Parker, J. (2004). Does traumatic birth increase the risk of postnatal depression? British Journal of Community Nursing, 9 (2), 74 – 79.
Reynolds, J.L. (1997). Post-traumatic stress disorder after childbirth: the phenomenon of traumatic birth. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 156 (6). |